ORATORY
IN THE 1950's a number of great speakers used to visit Madurai often. People gathered in large numbers in Thilagar Thidal or Tamukkam grounds or the Race Course to hear these orators who kept them spellbound.
Warm ups
But before the good speakers arrived, some half-baked speakers got hold of the mike and held forth in what they thought was great oratory. They imitated the mannerisms of the big ones, exaggerating them to the point of caricature. The audiences were hugely amused. These were considered light interludes before the serious business of the day began.
Once the big speakers arrived on the scene and took over, the crowd got totally involved, appreciating every nuance and gesture. Among the orators we flocked to listen to were Annadurai, Periyar, Rajaji, Nedunchezhiyan and others. We had once listened to Nehru too. But we were more captivated by his looks and style rather than by his speech. He threw several garlands at the crowd, and one of these happened to fall around the neck of a young woman. "I am married to Nehruji, I am married to Nehruji" she yelled, and the crowd burst into laughter and cheers.
Rajaji, merry and sad
I particularly liked the speeches of Rajaji. He had neither the linguistic flamboyance of the DMK speakers not the iconoclastic vehemence of Periyar. But he had a simple and effective way of communicating great truths without sounding pedantic.
He was once asked to inaugurate a club called Thozhamai Kazhagam in the Udipi Lodge in West Masi Street. Sensing that it was a light-hearted occasion, he scrupulously avoided politics and even literature, unlike the Dravidian leaders who would have made most of any occasion for their own ends. Rajaji made a fifteen minute speech in which he played on the word `thozhamai', and kept the audience in stitches. When we remembered that speech in the months that followed, it always brought a smile
to our lips. A few years later Rajaji made a speech in the Tamukkam grounds which was in stark contrast to the earlier one. This was after he and Nehru had fallen apart. Nehru had made a comment about Rajaji's "dotage", and that had hurt the veteran leader very deeply. The speech in Tamukkam was so sad that it brought tears to our eyes. And though we adored Nehru, we were angry with him for causing all this anguish. At the end of the speech there was not much applause. People walked away silently, feeling indignant.
Periyar's punch
Periyar used to visit American College quite often. His speech never had the niceties that Annadurai and others flourished on. It was blunt, and frequently featured the onion and the teardrop. Nevertheless it did pack a punch. He certainly made you think, even though for a short time. While the DMK leaders lulled you with rhetoric, Periyar rudely shook you awake to his kind of reality.
Though Annadurai was popular with many sections of the crowd, Nedunchezhiyan was our favourite DMK speaker. He had a thrilling way of modulating his voice, matched by appropriate body movement. Though we knew there was not much depth in his speeches, we enjoyed the light moments that they abounded in.
The scalp magic
Muthuramalinga Thevar was another big crowd puller. His anecdotes about Nethaji pleased the masses immensely. And the few sentences of English he spoke always evoked loud and long applause even though the major part of the audience didn't understand it. We once waited for him from 9 PM to 1AM. There was a slight but steady drizzle too. And yet we waited. When he arrived at 1AM he said, "Your devotion to me has made me feel that it would be inadequate even if I made footwear for you with my scalp." The crowd was so pleased that it didn't mind when he said that he had to leave immediately, and left.
In our heart of hearts we knew that most of these speakers were exploiting our gullibility. But still we enjoyed listening to them.
12.2.05
4 Comments:
Sir, happy new year. interesting piece.
My father used to remark that Anna's speeches had the simplicity of a refined person and the humaneness of a lover of all of mankind.
Chitra Lakshimi, Sorry, my opinion of CNA is quite different. This may be because of my acquaintance with him & other leaders during the 1948 conference at Kovilpatti, my hometown.
Interesting.Could you tell us about it or would it be politically incorrect to ask you to do this, profesor.
Post a Comment
<< Home